Shouldn’t it be “at a cost of RM4 billion” instead?

English grammar questions, answered by Alan

Moderator: Alan

Locked
tamguatlay
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
Posts: 601
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 3:58 pm
Status: Learner of English

Shouldn’t it be “at a cost of RM4 billion” instead?

Post by tamguatlay »

The Ulu Padas Hydroelectric Dam, which is expected to be completed in 2029 with a cost of RM4 billion, has a power supply capacity of 187.5 megawatts. A study is underway for a water supply of 6,000 million litres per day.

Shouldn’t it be “at a cost of RM4 billion” instead?

Thanks.
Alan
Teacher/Moderator
Teacher/Moderator
Posts: 15082
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 7:56 pm
Status: Teacher of English
Location: Japan

Re: Shouldn’t it be “at a cost of RM4 billion” instead?

Post by Alan »

Yes indeed, it should!
Locked